tinc vs. ipchains masquerading

[Wessel Dankers]

On 2002-03-04 22:59:26-0500, Lars Kellogg-Stedman wrote:
> Just so that it's absolutely clear and in the mail archive and all, is it
> fair to say that tinc, as currently implemented, will *not* work through an
> ipchains based firewall?

ITYM "ipchains based Network Address Translator". Quite a different thing,
although it's usually jumbled together in the Linux kernel.

A mere NAT does not a firewall make.

--
Wessel Dankers <wsl at fruit.eu.org>

That would be because the software doesn't work.
Tinc:         Discussion list about the tinc VPN daemon
Archive:      http://mail.nl.linux.org/lists/
Tinc site:    http://tinc.nl.linux.org/