Fwd: [Bug 109051] intel_idle.max_cstate=1 required on baytrail to prevent crashes

Paul Mansfield paul at mansfield.co.uk
Sun Sep 11 11:27:50 CEST 2016


Someone said they had two near identical NUCs bought at different times,
one quite stable, one not, and pondered if it was microcode patching in the
firmware

So this might explain why some people have more luck with their Baytrail
device being stable

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: <bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.kernel.org>
Date: 11 Sep 2016 10:08
Subject: [Bug 109051] intel_idle.max_cstate=1 required on baytrail to
prevent crashes

> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109051
>
> --- Comment #484 from Dmitry <nrndda at gmail.com> ---
> If this bug depends on firmware than I have bad news. Atom Baytrail
doesn't
> support microcode loading. Firstly tried tree different ways loading
microcode
> and none of them succeeded. Then found list of cpus which support
microcode
> loading and there is no Z3770.
>
> Mine microcode: sig=0x30673, pf=0x2, revision=0x324
>
> P.S. There is no microcode for 06-37-03 (Family-6,Model-55,Stepping-3).
>
> --
> You are receiving this mail because:
> You are on the CC list for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.tinc-vpn.org/pipermail/click/attachments/20160911/e8b5c453/attachment.html>


More information about the click mailing list