Fwd: Re: VPN Example 2

[Guus Sliepen]

On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 02:21:08AM -0500, md at rpzdesign.com wrote:

> Oops, I got it to work only after putting the WAN on port 656 so it
> did not interfere with port 655 for the LAN.

You should not need to have two tinc daemons just because you have a WAN
and a LAN interface. By default (ie, if you don't specify BindToAddress
and/or BindToInterface), tinc listens on all interfaces, and the
kernel should normally take care of selecting which outgoing interface
to use for tinc's packets.

-- 
Met vriendelijke groet / with kind regards,
     Guus Sliepen <guus at tinc-vpn.org>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://www.tinc-vpn.org/pipermail/tinc-devel/attachments/20141214/8e4dfea5/attachment.sig>