tinc on Fedora

[Mike Bentzen]

Udo van den Heuvel wrote:
> Yes, but we already *have* liblzo2 present.
> So it is not to clear from the output exactly what lzo-part is missing.
> When I unstall lzo-devel I also get lzo-minilzo.
> It is about /usr/lib64/liblzo2.so.2 versus /usr/lib64/liblzo2.so.
>   
liblzo2 is the actual library, whereas lzo-devel (liblzo2-dev) is the 
development library.
If you're compiling something, you need to make sure your system has the 
required dev libs.
I am not familiar with Fedora's packaging system, so I'm not sure about 
lzo-minilzo, Sorry.