Configuration problems

[Guus Sliepen]

On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 12:22:40PM -0300, Ahab the Whaler wrote:

> Here's a complete log dump (sorry, had to remove the real IPs):
> 
> Ago 13 12:08:15 Viatel01 syslog: syslogd terminado succeeded
> Ago 13 12:08:35 Viatel01 tinc.nextel[4662]: tincd 1.0pre7 (Apr 25 2002
> 18:34:45) starting, debug level 1Ago 13 12:08:35 Viatel01 tinc.nextel[4662]: Old ioctl() request was needed
> for /dev/tunAgo 13 12:08:35 Viatel01 tinc.nextel[4662]: /dev/tun is a Linux tun/tap
> deviceAgo 13 12:08:36 Viatel01 tinc.nextel[4662]: Listening on 0.0.0.0 port 443
> Ago 13 12:08:36 Viatel01 tinc.nextel[4662]: Ready
> Ago 13 12:08:36 Viatel01 tinc.nextel[4662]: Trying to connect to alpha
> (port 443)Aug 13 12:08:36 Viatel01 /etc/hotplug/net.agent: register event not handled
> Ago 13 12:08:37 Viatel01 tinc.nextel[4662]: Connected to alpha (port 443)
> Ago 13 12:08:37 Viatel01 tinc.nextel[4662]: Connection with alpha (port
> 443) activated

Seems like it's connecting fine.

> When I telnet to the 10.101.0 network behind alpha (from beta), I can see
> the packets arriving on alpha with tcpdump.

That's also very positive.

> I'm getting the feeling that some firewall, somewhere, is dropping the
> packets on the floor. I'll investigate and let you know.
> Just a doubt: there's no problem trying to connect the nets 192.168.1.0/24
> & 10.101.0.0/24, even if they don't have a common (sub) netmask, right?

It's not a problem at all. Just make sure you have the correct routes.

-- 
Met vriendelijke groet / with kind regards,
    Guus Sliepen <guus at sliepen.eu.org>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://brouwer.uvt.nl/pipermail/tinc/attachments/20020813/8c71f2b7/attachment.pgp