routing trouble (was: crashing on receiving connection)

Guus Sliepen guus at sliepen.warande.net
Fri Mar 9 12:35:24 CET 2001


On Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 11:37:40AM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote:

> I still have problems to imagine your scheme working. What are
> 192.168.1/2.0/24 in your example? Local networks, which are connected
> via tinc-tunnel?  Is the following correct:
[...]

Yes.

> tap0      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:FF:BE:4B:05:01
>           inet addr:192.168.0.0  Bcast:192.168.1.255  Mask:255.255.0.0
>           UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
>           RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>           TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>           collisions:0 txqueuelen:100

Here's the problem:

HWaddr should be FE:FD:00:00:00:00, and it should also say NOARP. You can fix
this by adding this to the tinc-up script (before anything else):

ifconfig tap0 hw ether fe:fd:0:0:0:0
ifconfig tap0 -arp

You must do so on both sides. Explaining why will take some time though :).

-------------------------------------------
Met vriendelijke groet / with kind regards,
  Guus Sliepen <guus at sliepen.warande.net>
-------------------------------------------
See also: http://tinc.nl.linux.org/
          http://www.kernelbench.org/
-------------------------------------------
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://brouwer.uvt.nl/pipermail/tinc/attachments/20010309/46cf33a2/attachment.pgp


More information about the Tinc mailing list