Build On CentOS

[Guus Sliepen]

On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 12:37:26AM -0500, md at rpzdesign.com wrote:

> Is it even worth my time to use any of the 1.1.X versions and only use
> the 1.0.24 Stable version for a VPN deployment today?
> 
> Or is the 1.10pre 95% stable and only lacking UDP forwarding?

If you want to run a stable version of tinc and don't need any of the
new features in 1.1, then by all means use 1.0.24.

> My use case is one where I have several servers connected by TCP/UDP
> and all servers are master, there is no hub and no slaves.
> 
> Each server only needs to talk to the other servers directly, never do
> they need to "forward" traffic to other servers.
> 
> So is 1.10pre ready for this use case?

Both 1.0 and 1.1pre handle that use case.

-- 
Met vriendelijke groet / with kind regards,
     Guus Sliepen <guus at tinc-vpn.org>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://www.tinc-vpn.org/pipermail/tinc-devel/attachments/20141208/c35d3532/attachment.sig>