friend of a friend type darknets

Guus Sliepen guus at tinc-vpn.org
Mon Sep 20 15:00:35 CEST 2010


On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 11:44:23PM +0200, Alex wrote:

> > It is less simple there. Also, when you
> > have a graph with cycles (for example, G connects to F as well), and not
> > everyone is using the FriendOfAFriend option, then you will get conflicting
> > ADD_EDGE messages, which will trigger a never-ending flood of correcting
> > DEL_EDGE and ADD_EDGE messages.
> isn't this the same problem, if peer A is known to B by a lan-ip and
> known to C by an internet IP?

No, since that will be two distinct edges, a B->A edge and a C->A edge.  But
suppose A has FriendOfAFriend set, but B and C do not, and B and C are also
connected to each other. Then it is possible that the B->C edge information
(that B sends to A and C  at some point) gets anonymised by A and forwarded to
C, which sees new information, and forwards it in turn to B, which will see
that someone forwarded the B->C edge, but with wrong IP address information.

-- 
Met vriendelijke groet / with kind regards,
     Guus Sliepen <guus at tinc-vpn.org>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://www.tinc-vpn.org/pipermail/tinc-devel/attachments/20100920/589fcb88/attachment.pgp>


More information about the tinc-devel mailing list