tinc 0.3.3 vs. 1.0pre2

[Ivo Timmermans]

Axel Müller wrote:
> > I just partly implemented what Ivo has called the "indirectdata" option.
> > Get it from the CVS tree. I have not been able to test it, but you might
> > :). For the moment, you still need to add it to every tinc daemon's
> > configuration (except to the "main" tincd).
> I just subscribed to tinc-cvs and also updated my local CVS workspace of 
> tinc.
> However I cannot guess what modifications you have done and how I should 
> test them.
> The latest entry in the NEWS file announces 1.0pre2. Do I have to run a 
> "cvs log" against each file of tinc? A "grep indirectdata" did not bring 
> anything up as well ...

You have to check out the tree with cvs checkout -r CABAL

This is not on the website yet because I'm not sure this is the way it
should be done.  Anyone with a clue on CVS can comment on it:)

-- 
Ivo Timmermans
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://brouwer.uvt.nl/pipermail/tinc-devel/attachments/20000624/275b7841/attachment.pgp